Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Craig Scott's avatar

Alison’s comment on the CLC’s list of measures is a very important one, in my view. It is not only monetized forms of support that are crucial but also the maintenance and even deepening (with need) of service supports for workers, families and communities at a time of the effects of economic coercion by the US or structural dislocation as Canada responds and pivots away from US dependence — or, worse, much more aggressive coercion extending to military by the US. Canada’s social state has never been reducible to replacing or supplementing income but its strengths are the public goods dimensions — from the (admittedly full of holes) health system to children’s education to public childcare to shelters and housing for those fleeing harm (a long list could continue). Only with robust public goods is a social democracy truly bound together in a solidarity network - in my view anyway.

Expand full comment
Craig Scott's avatar

In the original post, we highlighted the Canadian Labour Congress’ overview of what is needed by way of immediate and future policy on behalf of workers, their families and their communities. We numbered the many points for ease of discussion.

We have added to the post now to draw attention to the demands of the CLC in a very recent latter sent to the new Prime Minister of what needs to happen immediately and before any election. Go to the top of the post to see a link to a summary in a news release, “Canada’s unions to Carney: Protect workers from job losses and uncertainty,” (March 11) and a link to the whole letter here.

The CLC letter does not address the specific question of whether new legislation is needed or, as the former PM Trudeau seems to have claimed, that such a massive range of changes could be done purely by executive regulatory action. However, if PM Carney’s reported plans (to call an election to start as early as the end of this week) are true, then the issue of legislation versus executive action during the election period would be moot because our constitutional convention of a government acting only in a “caretaker” mode during an election means that such sweeping changes during an election would be a contravention of this convention.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts